30 Day Book Challenge: Day Five

Day Five: A non-fiction book that you actually enjoyed
The Science of Harry Potter: How Magic Really Works by Roger Highfield.

First of all, I have to get up on my high horse about how this question insinuates that non-fiction books are not enjoyable. I’ve read heaps. I went to University. I’m so used to reading non-fiction and I find it fascinating. I can easily get addicted to reading science articles. Anyway, let me continue.

This book was so interesting and so informative, I think I read it three times within the space of a month. It delves into all the magic of the Harry Potter world and explains how, using science, it might be possible, either currently or in the future. It sure was interesting reading about the broomsticks and the invisibility cloak, and how Quidditch could be played.

I also read that it was Neanderthals that were red-haired, and when they were bred out of existence, their descendants inherited the ginger gene. Not really sure how true it is (in fact, I think it has been disproved), but it sure was interesting while I was reading it.

30 Day Book Challenge: Day Four

Day Four: A book that reminds you of home.

The Silver Brumby by Elyne Mitchell

What can I say about this magnificent talking horse book? I suppose it’s not exactly a children’s book, although it’s certainly rated G… or maybe PG because of the violence of the fighting stallions. It’s a very realistic portrayal of the Australian bush animals that just happen to be able to communicate in a way readers can understand (hence the speech). But it’s also a magnificent look at the older days of the white settlers, before modern conveniences, and how they treat the native and feral animals. It’s also a big study into jealousy and bullying for our noble silver-coated hero.

The Silver Brumby is in fact a creamy-coloured little colt, named Thowra (which means ‘wind’), born of the same creamy-coloured mare Bel Bel. Thowra is Bel Bel’s first foal of the same colour, and they’ll never forget each other. I think it’s technically some kind of pale palomino, but given that Mitchell makes it very clear Thowra’s winter coat looks silver rather than cream, it could even be some kind of colour I don’t have a name for. My personal version had a dark palamino horse on the cover, and I don’t see how that could ever be ‘creamy’ or ‘silver’.

Thowra is brought up to be very bush-wise, even more so than his contemporaries (except his best friend and brother, Storm, a gorgeous bay stallion). Thowra will be hunted his entire life because of his unusual and rare colour, and the other stallions will be jealous of him. So he needs to be able to run very fast, to avoid his pursuers. He’s brave, resourceful, and cares deeply for his herd. He’s also proud, cheeky, and a lot of fun. As he grows up from foal to stallion, we see him grow into his strength and leadership, and see him even gather an enormous sense of responsibility, like any good leader. His strength and speed grow, and his ability to lose his pursuers gains him a legend-like status, so much so that he’s often referred to as the ‘ghost horse’. He’s also incredibly smart, and knows how to rile up his pursuers, whether they be other stallions or humans on horseback, often goading them into a rage that allows him to escape.

There are so many great scenes in this book it’s hard to pick just one. There are several running scenes where you really feel like you’re seeing the world through a horses’ eyes. There’s magnificent fight scenes between rival stallions (and I cry when Thowra’s father, the magnificent chestnut Yarraman, is beaten to death by his biggest rival, The Brolga, to take over the Cascade herd). There are brumby hunts where you feel the terror of the horses. In winter, when the horses are starving and looking for anything to eat, you feel the desperation in their foraging.

This book reminds me of home because of the most wonderful imagery and descriptions of the Australian bush. Well yes, I did grow up in an entirely different area, and I’m pretty sure the story is actually based in the Snowy Mountains region in southern NSW, but it’s so easy for me to see the bush this way. It reminds me of an Australian Christmas, a gorgeous summer, and I used to read it at least once a year (my version is seriously falling apart). Now I read it whenever I get a little homesick.

30 Day Book Challenge: Day Three

Day Three: A Book that completely surprised you

Northanger Abbey by Jane Austen

Northanger Abbey was often published in the same volume as Persuasion, both being the final novels of Austen. It’s a self-referential Gothic novel starring a Gothic fiction obsessed Catherine Morland who goes to Bath for social engagements and ends up staying with some friends in the big gloomy estate Northanger Abbey. Catherine is convinced that Northanger Abbey, like her favourite book The Mysteries of Udolpho, contains some wickedly gothic elements, such as a wife murdered by her husband and unburied, and a mysterious room with secrets in it as well.

It’s all in her head. But considering Northanger Abbey was written in 1799 and published (posthumously) in 1817, it was ahead of its time by really spoofing the other Gothic novels of the same era.

Catherine is initially naive, with an over-active imagination, and she is completely ignorant of other’s malignant intentions. However, she is also sweet, insightful, and funny. Stylised as a heroine from the outset, she eventually grows into the role – not because she is trapped in a Gothic novel, as she would love to believe, but through a complication of errors and manners that lead her to grow into herself as she experiences the outside world. Even though the novel is so old, I really found it easy to identify with Catherine: she seemed very real to me, and very modern.

The novel surprised me because it was styling itself as a Gothic novel (through Catherine’s narrative, not though Austen herself) and it’s really a parody of other famous works, often mentioning them in the text. I really, really enjoyed this book – but it should only be read if other Gothic novels of the time have already been read, otherwise all the references and themes and allegorical wit won’t make this book very enjoyable. I suppose it was one of the first meta-narratives in literature. That’s just totally awesome.


Note – Northanger Abbey seems to have inspired Ian McEwan‘s famous novel and film adaptation, Atonement. Both novels have a protagonist with an over-active imagination, who causes havoc around her because of her belief and desire for real life to be like in fiction.

30 Day Book Challenge: Day Two

Day Two: Your Least Favourite Book

Professor Midnight by Lynn Santa and Peter Andrew Wright

This is simply the worst book I have ever read. I wrote a review for it and posted it under a different name on Amazon in 2006. The other reviewers seemed to have read a different book, for they all gave it 5 stars. Anyway, here we go:

Although the author is credited as doing in-depth research for this novel, it is nothing that anyone with a passing interest in Wiccan, genetic, religious, historical, or political practices would know. The story seems more like a justification for writing sex scenes that reflect an old man’s sexual fantasies rather than a really coherent story. And was there even an editor? There is punctuation and basic spelling mistakes that make it seem like it was written by a teenager – how did they miss them?!. The references to Leonardo Da Vinci‘s Codes seem to me as simply jumping on the bandwagon and taking advantage of the phenomenal reception of the Dan Brown book.
This story did not flow well but was jerky and dysfunctional, especially when it came to spoken dialogue, unspoken or implied dialogue, and characterisation. It was like the author did not know what to mention and what to exclude as a summary. The inclusion of large-scale events such as the Academy Awards and visiting the Amazon Jungle was probably mentioned in the vain hope that an eventual movie adaptation would have stunning scenery. It seems like this was the first draft of a promising novel, accidentally sent to publishers instead of the final result.
Of the many times I put this book down in disgust, or laughed out loud at the pretentious statements, I picked it back up again in the vain hope it would get better, or that I would finish it and publish a truthful review. Avoid at all costs!

I’d also like to mention that the main character is a cross between the Phantom of the Opera and Casanova. It’s awkward, ugly, and a little wrong. There is so much MORE I could say about why I hate this book, but I will hope you can take my review (which is most certainly NOT personal, but completely objective) as a warning to avoid it.

30 Day Book Challenge: Day One

Day One: Your Favourite Book

Wuthering Heights by Emily Bronte, 1847.

I love the flaws in this book: passion, the selfishness, the grief of the main characters. I love that it’s set in a very small location over a few generations – it’s a family epic, and I love that. I love that it’s told from multiple points of view (narration within narration within narration) which is pretty awesome for a book written in 1847.

This picture is from the 2009 BBC miniseries, which I think was a gorgeous adaptation.